Везде

RAS Agricultural ScienceРоссийская сельскохозяйственная наука Russian Agricultural Sciences

  • ISSN (Print) 2500-2627
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5820

THE REGULATORY ROLE OF ENTOMOPHAGES IN REDUCING THE ABUNDANCE OF MAJOR PESTS IN SOYBEAN CROPS

You can
PII
10.31857/S2500262725030044-1
DOI
10.31857/S2500262725030044
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
M. V. Petrishcheva
  • Affiliation: Federal Scientific Center for Biological Plant Protection
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 3
Pages
21-26
Abstract
The aim of the research was to study the species composition and trophic specialization of entomophages to regulate the number of major soybean pests. The research was carried out in 2023-2024 in Krasnodar on soybean varieties Vita and Grant (2 ha), as well as in the Dinskoy (10 ha) and Korenovsky districts (15 ha) on varieties Vilana, Vilana Beta, and Veda, in farms practicing environmentally sound plant protection systems. The biopesticide Akkar, Zh (4 l/ha) was applied twice against the cotton bollworm and the acacia moth at 10-day intervals. To account for the species composition and abundance of insects were conducted, mowing with entomological nets of various modifications, setting Malaise traps, and for accounting of parasites were used cocoons, pupae, imagos and eggs of host insects, which were set in semi-isolated containers. The species composition of the dominant pests and their complex of entomophages on soybean crops has been established. The parasite complex of owlet moths on soybean was represented by 43 species of the following families: Ichneumonidae, Bethylidae, Braconidae, Encyrtidae, Elasmidae, Eupelmidae, Eulophidae, Pteromalidae, Torymidae, Trichogrammatidae. 7 species of the Coccinellidae family were found on soybean crops, where 6 species are entomophages and 1 species is mycophage. The main species of parasitic hymenoptera have been identified, the trophic relationships of which are associated with pulse pod borer moth (E. zinckenella) at various preimaginal stages of its development. Two native parasitic HymenopteraP. cassidae and A. cassidae identified in soybean crops showed to be effective against adventitious species of stink bugs H. halys and N. viridula.
Keywords
соя (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) энтомофаги паразиты пищевые связи контроль вредителей
Date of publication
13.05.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
21

References

  1. 1. Заостровных В. И., Дубовицкая Л. К. Вредные организмы сои и система фитосанитарной оптимизации ее посевов. Новосибирск: Издательство Максачук Н. Л., 2003. 528 с.
  2. 2. Экологическая защита посевов сои в орошаемых агроландшафтах Нижнего Поволжья / В. В. Мелихов, О. П. Комарова, Е. В. Комаров и др. // Успехи современного естествознания. 2018. № 12. С. 81-86.
  3. 3. The biochemical and molecular mechanisms of plants: a review on insect herbivory / A. A. Adedayo, R. Musser, M. Aanaenson, et al. // Plant Signaling and Behavior. 2025. Vol. 20. No. 1. Article 2439248. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15592324.2024.2439248 (дата обращения: 18.02.2024). doi: 10.1080/15592324.2024.2439248.
  4. 4. Федорова С. Н. Вредная энтомофауна соевого агроценоза в Орловской области // Зернобобовые и крупяные культуры. 2013. № 4(8). С. 58-63.
  5. 5. Коваленко Т. К., Гришечкина С. Д., Кочева Н. С. Защита растений сои от фитофагов в условиях Приморского края // Сибирский вестник сельскохозяйственной науки. 2023. Т. 53. № 11. С. 46-52. doi: 10.26898/0370-8799-2023-11-5.
  6. 6. Коваленко Т. К., Лукашенко А. В. Фитосанитарное состояние посевов сои в Приморском крае // Международный научно-исследовательский журнал. 2020. № 8-1(98). С. 208-211. doi: 10.23670/IRJ.2020.98.8.032.
  7. 7. Дега Л. А., Бутовец Е. С., Лукьянчук Л. М. Соя: болезни и вредители - Москва: Федеральное государственное бюджетное научное учреждение «Федеральный научный центр агробиотехнологий Дальнего Востока им. А. К. Чайки», 2022. 127 с.
  8. 8. Soybean Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Feeding Behavior is Largely Unchanged by Soybean Mosaic Virus but Significantly Altered by the Beetle-Transmitted Bean Pod Mottle Virus / J. C. Todd, L. R. Stewart, M. G. Redinbaugh, et al. // Journal of Economic Entomology. 2022. Vol. 115. No. 4. P. 1059-1068. doi: 10.1093/jee/toac060.
  9. 9. Feeding Behavior Comparison of Bean Bugs, Riptortus pedestris and Halyomorpha halys on Different Soybean Cultivars / S. B. Park, H. N. Koo, S. J. Seok, et al. // Insects. 2023. Vol. 14. No. 4. Article 322. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/14/4/322 (дата обращения: 3.03.2024). doi: 10.3390/insects14040322.
  10. 10. Nutritional indices of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera, on 13 soybean varieties / B. Naseri, Y. Fathipour, S. Moharramipour, et al. // Journal of Insect Science. 2010. Vol. 10. Article 151. URL: https://bioone.org/journals/journal-of-insect-science/volume-10/issue-151/031.010.1411/Nutritional-Indices-of-the-Cotton-Bollworm-Helicoverpa-armigera-on-13/10.1673/031.010.1411.full (дата обращения: 3.03.2024). doi: 10.1673/031.010.1411.
  11. 11. Feeding injury of major lepidopteran soybean pests in South America / P. D. Carpane, M. Llebaria, A. F. Nascimento, et al. // PLoS One. 2022. Vol. 17. No. 12. Article e0271084. URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0271084 (дата обращения: 3.03.2024). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271084.
  12. 12. Challenges for Adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM): the Soybean Example / A. F. Bueno, A. R. Panizzi, T. E. Hunt, et al. // Neotropical Entomology. 2021. Vol. 50. No. 1. P. 5-20. doi: 10.1007/s13744-020-00792-9.
  13. 13. Tallgrass prairie wildlife exposure to spray drift from commonly used soybean insecticides in Midwestern USA / K. M. Goebel, N. M. Davros, D. E. Andersen, et al. // Science of the Total Environment. 2022. Vol. 818. Article 151745. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969721068212?via%3Dihub (дата обращения: 3.03.2024). doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151745.
  14. 14. Modeling the Resistance Evolution to Insecticides Driven by Lepidopteran Species Competition in Cotton, Soybean, and Corn Crops / J. B. Malaquias, C. P. Ferreira, F. S. Ramalho, et al. // Biology (Basel). 2022. Vol. 11(9). Article 1354. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/11/9/1354 (дата обращения: 3.03.2024). doi: 10.3390/biology11091354.
  15. 15. Intra- and Interspecific Variation in the Susceptibility to Insecticides of Stink Bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) That Attack Soybean and Maize in Southern Brazil / E. A. Steinhaus, L. F. Warpechowski, L. E. Braga, et al. // Journal of Economic Entomology. 2022. Vol. 115. No. 2. P. 631-636. doi: 10.1093/jee/toac013.
  16. 16. Савчук И. В. Мониторинг численности и вида насекомых-вредителей для обеспечения безопасности сельскохозяйственной продукции. Тюмень: ФГБОУ ВО ГАУ Северного Зауралья, 2023. 154 с.
  17. 17. Злотин А. З. Техническая энтомология. Киев: Наукова думка, 1989. 183 с.
  18. 18. Тамарина Н. А. Основы технической энтомологии. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1990. 202 с.
  19. 19. Use of Biological Agents to Control the Number of Halyomorpha halys Stål / I. S. Agasyeva, V. Ya. Ismailov, M. V. Petrishcheva, et al. // Advancements in Life Sciencis. 2024. Vol. 11. 3. P. 696-702. doi: 10.62940/als.v11i3.3265.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library